see below for answer...

but oh my...I did not do what I thought I did...applying the errata appears to
need to be done by hand...I thought I had downloaded already patched files...

Now I suppose that we should archive the RFC and errata separately...and let the
interested reader consult the rfc####.errata file as needed...

changing vote to 2)

sorry.

Dave Shield wrote:
> 
> Can someone please supply an example of the sort of errata that we're
> talking about?
> 
> Dave
> (One of the people who don't even realize the errata exist!)
> 


http://www.rfc-editor.org/cgi-bin/errataSearch.pl

Erratum for RFC 3413

RFC 3413, "Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications", December 
2002

Reported By: Eduardo Cardona; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:42

In Section 4.2.1, page 50, in DESCRIPTION clause of snmpNotifyFilterTable:

        A more complete discussion of notification filtering
        can be found in section 6. of [SNMP-APPL]."


It should be:

        A more complete discussion of notification filtering
        can be found in section 6. of RFC3413."


Additionally, page 52, in DESCRIPTION clause of snmpNotifyFilterType:

        filter.  A more detailed discussion of the use of this
        object can be found in section 6. of [SNMP-APPL]."


It should be:

        filter.  A more detailed discussion of the use of this
        object can be found in section 6. of RFC3413."



Reported By: Guan Hai Bing; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 14:36:59 +0800

In Section 3.5.1.1:

    (2) If appropriate outgoing management target information cannot be
        found, the proxy forwarder increments the snmpProxyDrops
        counter [RFC1907], and then calls the Dispatcher using the
        returnResponsePdu abstract service interface.

Should be:

    (2) If appropriate outgoing management target information cannot be
        found, the proxy forwarder increments the snmpProxyDrops
        counter [RFC3418], and then calls the Dispatcher using the
        returnResponsePdu abstract service interface.

In Sections 3.2 and 4.1.2:

    by [RFC1905]

Should be:

    by [RFC3416]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to