Dave Shield wrote: >> How do we want to fix this? Introduce a configure check for va_copy and > > Yes, that would probably be sensible.
Anyone knows of a ready-to-use (and appropriately licensed) va_copy configure check that does more than just AC_CHECK_FUNC(va_copy)? >> #ifndef HAVE_VA_COPY >> #define va_copy(dest, src) (dest) = (src) >> #endif >> >> in snmplib/snmp_logging.c? > > If that's the correct behaviour. > I'm just unsure if copying the list head is sufficient, or whether > we'd need to do a "deep copy" of the full list. I think I've seen it done like this before, so we'd probably be okay. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
