Hi
Did you compiled your Net-SNMP package with DISMAN-MIB?
I remember, diman implementation in Net-SNMP-5.2.1 has memory leak, if you configure “monitor” directive for linkup/linkdown notification, then definitely DISMAN-MIB implementation will get invoked every 2/3 sec ( based on your configuration )
Attached some mails, have a look.
<<Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support>> <<Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support>> <<Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support>>
In 5.3.1 disman implementation is completely changed, if you have issue with disman MIB implementation, you can have a try 5.3.1 version?
Santhosh
--- Begin Message --- Title: Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I compile and ran net-snmp-5.2.1 SNMP agent with purify
> option in red hat. Memory was leaked in following places.
[...]
> Is this memory leak is fixed in latest versions?Hopefully. We'd appreciate to get your results of the same testing for
5.3.1.pre3 or later.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Title: Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I compile and ran net-snmp-5.2.1 SNMP agent with purify
> option in red hat. Memory was leaked in following places .
>
[snip]> Is this memory leak is fixed in latest versions ?
>The DisMan Event MIB has been completely re-implemented for 5.3 and above.
This code is entirely unrelated to the previous implementation.Try that version, and let us know what problems (if any) you encounter.
Dave
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Title: Re: Memory leak in DISMAN-MIB support[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In 5.2.1, I had face thru put issue. When I am running snmpd
>with monitor directive configured, target boards thru put went down.
>Once the monitor directive is removed, thru put seems to be fine.
>
> I ran snmpd using 'strace', there are so many system calls made
>frequently after configured time interval.
>
>Is this also fixed in 5.3?
>
>Same answer - it's a complete re-implementation, so the code is
entirely new. It's meaningless to ask whether a given problem has
been "fixed". All I can suggest is that you try it, and see whether
the new code suffers from the same problems.>I saw long discussion going wrt 'netlink' facility for linkup and down
>traps. It this implemented/under construction?
>
>I am exploring on the same. Please give me some help/reference wrt
>netlink facility.
>
>Sorry - I'm not really following the lists much at the moment, so have
no real idea what that discussion was about.Dave
--- End Message ---
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
