Thomas Anders wrote: > Wes Hardaker wrote: >> Sounds like everyone actually agrees without arguments or objections. >> I'm now scared. > > Looks like we've agreed "in principle", but we still have to decide the > little details (like what *exactly* should be kept in "dist" for the > source distribution) and make the corresponding changes, ideally before > 5.3.pre5. > > Initial proposal for the content of "dist" in the source tarball: > net-snmp.spec, snmpd-init.d, snmptrapd-init.d, README (to be written).
However, at the end, net-snmp.spec has *not* been kept in the patches branches, but only in MAIN. How to properly handle the differences between the different branches in this situation? Will "%if" contructs for the various branches in net-snmp.spec really ease maintenance? Guess what? My vote is to add dist/net-snmp.spec back to the patches branches instead. Your feedback is appreciated. +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
