Robert Story (Coders) wrote on 2004-05-11: > On Tue, 11 May 2004 08:26:37 -0700 Wes wrote: > WH> >>>>> On Mon, 10 May 2004 22:23:59 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) > WH> > WH> Robert> I like the idea, and think we could probably squeeze this into > WH> Robert> 5.2. Can anyone think of any potential backwards compatibility > WH> Robert> issues with introducing this behavior change? > WH> > WH> Only with broken configurations. > > That was my thought too.. > > WH> Robert> If so, would could use a new token, or require an extra > WH> Robert> parameter to turn on partial matching. But I couldn't think of > WH> Robert> any off the top of my head. > WH> > WH> I'd add it to the existing. > > You mean add the new behaviour change, w/out requiring any special parameters? > That's the direction I was leaning, too..
There seems to have been a 2:1 for applying the patch as-is, back then. I've attached the original (simple) patch to Robert's patch tracker item 1536773 on the same issue (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1536773&group_id=12694&atid=312694) together with my vote (now 3:1) for applying it. Good to go into 5.4? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
