>3) hrStorageIndexes
I'm happy with the current state (unsurprisingly!),
though it's probably sensible to document the change. Any
objections?
Locking the beginning of the disk entries into index 30 assumes nobody would
'be stupid'/'is insane'/'has a server overworked' enough to have more than
29 swap entries. That's not a good assumption. There's also nothing in the
MIB about it. Why can't they just be contiguous?
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is
addressed, and may contain confidential, personal and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action
relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply,
should be deleted or destroyed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
