On 18/10/06, Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like someone had to choose between breaking the > /var/agentx/master convention and the FHS (no new subdirectories under > /var without FHS consultation).
> If this imposes any kind of serious problem, please describe, or even > better: File a bug against the net-snmp package in Debian. Then we can > sort it out. It seems to me that this isn't really a Debian- or Net-SNMP- issue. Both of us are simply following the agreed standards from our respective environments. Surely this is something that could bite *any* FHS-based O/S and *any* AgentX-capable SNMP agent? I'd have thought this is something that should be raised with either the AgentX working group, or the FHS people. I've been subscribed to the AgentX list for several years, and can't recall seeing any mention of this problem. And a quick search of the FHS list for "agentx" doesn't throw up anything. On a slightly different note - should we (i.e. Net-SNMP) consider adjusting the default location of the persistent directory? A quick perusal of the FHS specs would indicate that we should perhaps be using /var/lib/net-snmp. Or is that a can of worms that's better left unmentioned? Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
