On 30/10/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, enclosed is the patch.  It's a more major change than I'd
> ideally like for a last minute change, but it was something we agreed
> upon and thus I should at least offer it.  I'm voting +1, but barely.


===================================================================
> --- configure.in        26 Oct 2006 11:14:02 -0000      5.289
> +++ configure.in        30 Oct 2006 16:05:35 -0000

> +if test ! -d mk ; then
> +  mkdir mk
> +fi


> diff -u -p -r5.72 Makefile.in
> --- Makefile.in 17 Oct 2006 23:05:40 -0000      5.72
> +++ Makefile.in 30 Oct 2006 16:05:35 -0000
> -       rm -f module_rules.mk mib_module_list_deps.mk module_list_deps.mk \
> -               agent_module_list_deps.mk
> +       rm -f mk


If 'mk' is a directory, then shouldn't this be either "rm -rf mk" or
"rmdir mk" ?

Dave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to