Can somebody explain to me why, in close_agentx_session(), part of the
session infrastructure is taken down first
(unregister_XXX_by_session()), and _then_ the requests are cleaned up,
rather than the other way round?
We're having problems as subtrees are already freed (by
unregister_mibs_by_session()) which are later referenced by
netsnmp_remove_delegated_requests_for_session().
Wouldn't it make more sense to take something down in the reverse order
in which it was constructed?
--
Josef Möllers (Pinguinpfleger bei FSC)
If failure had no penalty success would not be a prize
-- T. Pratchett
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
