>>>>> "GSM" == G S Marzot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GSM> If no one else has a supporting/dissenting opinion on this I GSM> suppose I will have to defer to the status quo as proposed by wes GSM> (5.04000001)...though this seems over large and over restrictive GSM> on what libsnmp releases it will run with...if you have an GSM> opinion, now might be a good time to share it. Note that the restriction is an warning... you can compile anyway. The version check is code so even if we wanted to release a different version requirement mandate, I'd still argue the above version number scheme is the safest to stick with regardless of how strong we were going to enforce a binding. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
