Dave Shield wrote: > On 22/12/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I realize that snmpv3/usmUser is v4/ucd-based. What are the options for >> performance improvements? > > My gut reaction would be to re-implement this module using one of the > v5-handlers - perhaps tweaking the snmplib/snmpusm.c code to use > a container, rather than a linked list. > That could then be used with either Robert's MfD framework, or the > table_tdata helper - either of which should provide a more efficient > implementation.
Re-implementing a non-trivial mib module using helpers I have zero experience with sounds a bit over my head (and time budget) for the moment, admittedly, unless someone feels motivated enough to lend me a hand (or two). How much of the snmpv3/usmUser core code could likely be reused in a new implementation with one of those two helpers? +Thomas -- Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at blue-cable.de) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
