you can write ur own template code. The syntax is not very difficult and will help you get the exact code structure u want. I have done this once since but i wasnt integrating with the netsnmp agent
-SIGTERM amit -------- Original-Nachricht -------- Datum: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:05:00 -0500 Von: Adam Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [email protected] CC: Betreff: mib2c generated code and GET_NEXT > I have started using mib2c to generate the stub code for my access > routines. > > > > I see much commonality in the bulk of the code but I have a couple > questions, if anyone could I would appreciate it. > > > > 1. Using mib2c -c mib2c.scalar.conf <MIBNAME>:<Scalar Name> > works > like a champ, I have get and set working. > > > > 2. Using mib2c -c mib2c.table.conf <MIBNAME>:<Table Name> > > Basic code is there, there are a few incorrect pointer > dereferences, but not a huge problem, I have get and set working > > What is missing are the get first and next support routines > found under the next two options. (for GET_NEXT operations) > > The files mib2c created we on the order of 25Kbytes of code > > > > > > 2. Using mib2c -c mib2c.iterate_access.conf <MIBNAME>:<Table Name> > > > 3. Using mib2c -c mib2c.mfd.conf <MIBNAME>:<Table Name> > > These worked, with the same problems described above but the amount of > code > generated is on the order of 200K (yikes) > > > > > > I am building a small application and with 40 tables and 100 scalars, I > can > not afford the MFD approach or iterate approach. Debug is still on but > the > relative size of the files compared to each other will still be dramatic. > > > > Question 1: Can I simply lift the first and next routines from the other 2 > mib2c runs and use them in the table style code? MFD seems to have done > away with the huge switch statement in the generated code. > > > > Question 2: The code comments around the table and iterate styles have > MODE_GET: and state these handle GET_NEXT and GET_BULK when in fact they > do > not. > > The MODE_GET_NEXT and MODE_GET_BULK are not handled, > maybe > that is why the get_first and get_next handlers for the row search are > missing too? > > What to do here? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Adam J. Bell > > > > > > > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be > privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying > or disclosing it. -- Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
