Hi,
thanx santhosh..
I am able to purify the code..
I feel that memory leak is there when send_v2trap is called, but i am not
getting any MLK/PLK in traces
top display:
26760 root 1 0 19 9248K 5608K run 0:01 0.30% snmpd
top display after a trap is sent ===> for each trap sent there is a increase
of 40K in SIZE and goes upto 50M.
26760 root 1 0 19 9288K 5648K run 0:01 0.31% snmpd
we are using net-snmp version 5.3.0.1.
whether above increase in SIZE is memory leak?
Thanx,
Devi.U
============================================================================================================================
Tech Mahindra, formerly Mahindra-British Telecom.
Disclaimer:
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review
at <a
href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a>
externally and <a
href="http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html">http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a>
internally within Tech Mahindra.
============================================================================================================================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders