On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:01:20AM +0200, Thomas Anders wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Revision: 16397 > > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=16397&view=rev > > Author: magfr > > Date: 2007-05-19 08:27:24 -0700 (Sat, 19 May 2007) > > > > Log Message: > > ----------- > > CHANGES: building: Check for support of static inline functions instead of > > nested static inline functions when determining if static inline functions > > work > > > > Modified Paths: > > -------------- > > branches/V5-2-patches/net-snmp/configure > [...] > > branches/V5-3-patches/net-snmp/configure > > You've generated the configure files for 5.2.x/5.3.x with autoconf 2.61 > instead of 2.59 which I don't think is safe yet. At the very least 2.61 > configure would generate warnings like: > > config.status: WARNING: /home/anders/src/net-snmp-5.3svn/Makefile.top > /home/anders/src/net-snmp-5.3svn/Makefile.in > /home/anders/src/net-snmp-5.3svn/Makefile.rules seems to ignore the > --datarootdir setting > > which I think we've discussed earlier on -coders.
Indeed: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20051008164316.GH5686%40quartz.itdept.newn.cam.ac.uk I should have worded the 21-Jan-2006 reply a bit more strongly: I don't think the objection to having [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ is valid.. Cheers, Patrick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
