On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Need wrote: NH> Also, since Table2 shares the cache from Table1, then I would assume there is no reason to set the "cache->timeout" and "cache->flags" values in the Table2_container_init() routine ..... is this correct? NH> NH> NH> Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Since Table2 is now successfully using the cache and container from Table1, NH> then I planned on removing the following routines which are specific to Table2. NH> NH> Is this safe to do? These routines do not look like they would be required anymore but I am not sure exactly when they would get called so I am not certain if this is a good idea or not. NH> NH> NH> In the "Table2_data_access.c" file I plan on removing: NH> NH> Table2_container_init NH> Table2_container_shutdown NH> Table2_container_load NH> Table2_container_free NH> NH> NH> In the "Table2_interface.c" file I plan on removing: NH> NH> Table2_allocate_rowreq_ctx NH> Table2_release_rowreq_ctx NH> _cache_load NH> _cache_free NH> _container_item_free NH> _container_free NH> _Table_container_shutdown
yes on all counts.. (I think.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
