Here is the output after changing the "snmpd.conf" file to have the following 
lines:

    master agentx
    agentxsocket 127.0.0.1:1610
    rocommunity  mycommunity_ro  


Here is the "netstat -an" output:

Active Internet connections (servers and established)

Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address         State
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:23              0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN
tcp        0    138 10.0.0.2:23             10.0.0.3:3455           ESTABLISHED
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:1024            0.0.0.0:*
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:800             0.0.0.0:*
udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:161             0.0.0.0:*

Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
Proto RefCnt Flags       Type       State         I-Node Path
unix  5      [ ]         DGRAM                    39     /var/dev/log
unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     111    
/tmp/xfs_fragtask_mnt_gpfs_ew_media_content_recorded
unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    126    
/tmp/inm_unix_sock_worker
unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    128    /tmp/inm_unix_sock_main
unix  2      [ ACC ]     STREAM     LISTENING     495    127.0.0.1:1610
unix  3      [ ]         STREAM     CONNECTED     113    
/tmp/xfs_fragtask_mnt_gpfs_ew_media_content_recorded
unix  3      [ ]         STREAM     CONNECTED     117
unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    115
unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    109
unix  2      [ ]         DGRAM                    43


Does the master agent look like it is started on port 1610 now?   I am not sure 
how to read this output correctly (obviously).




 Never knew snmptranslate did stuff outside of the master agent ..... thanks 
for telling me this.  So, is there a certain command I could run to verify the 
master agent is "working"?  Come to think of it .... I guess I could do a 
snmpget (or something) on the "IF-MIB" since the master agent implements this 
MIB internally already.
 
I guess my "snmpd.conf" and "subagent.c" files should have "127.0.0.1::1610" 
instead of "localhost:1610"?

I realize Robert indicated using the 127.0.0.1 before (instead of localhost), 
but I thought that was just for when I executed a SNMP request (ie: snmpget, 
snmpwalk ,etc...) for some reason.

So .... since my "snmpd.conf" and "subagent.c" files had "localhost::1610" all 
this time, then how come issuing the following "snmpwalk" request "did" return 
data for my OC-STB-HOST-MIB table?  I mean I am giving the 127.0.0.1 address in 
 the snmpwalk request but it worked even though the files had the 
"localhost::1610" value in it ..... why .... just curious?

snmpwalk -v1 -c mycommunity_ro 127.0.0.1 ocStbHostAVInterfaceTable






Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 20/07/07, Need Help  wrote:
> 1) I performed the following "netstat -an" command to verify the snmpd
> master agent was indeed listening on port "1610":

No, it's not.
It's listening on a named Unix socket called "localhost:1610".
You embedded box doesn't recognise "localhost" as a hostname.

We've been through this once before.





> 2) I issued the following command and verified the master agent could
> process a master agent specific MIB  request:
>
> /usr/local/bin # snmptranslate -On SNMPv2-MIB::sysUpTime.0
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0

No, you haven't.
The "snmptranslate" command doesn't go anywhere near the SNMP agent.
It just works with the MIB files directly.



> 3) I issued the following command and verified the master agent knew about
> my MIB text file (OC-STB-HOST-MIB):
>
> /usr/local/bin # snmptranslate -Tp -IR
> OC-STB-HOST-MIB::ocStbHostAVInterfaceType.1

No, you haven't.
See above.


Dave

        

---------------------------------
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel 
and lay it on us.         

---------------------------------
Choose the right car based on your needs.   Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car 
Finder tool. 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders


       
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to