Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On mån, 2007-10-15 at 13:07 -0400, Robert Story wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:03:12 +0200 Thomas wrote: >> TA> Robert Story wrote: >> TA> > I tend to agree. And if we are going to make this a public global in >> the >> TA> > library, then I strongly suggest we rename it, prefixing with >> 'netsnmp_trapd' >> TA> > or something in that vein... >> TA> >> TA> +1 for the rename, but I still think this change should be trunk only. >> TA> IMHO there's not enough benefit here to justify an incompatible change >> TA> in a branch. > > I do not think this should be made a public global, and I would put in a > -1 to that just in case. Wes original patch moved this into a ds_boolean > and that is way better than a free variable. > With that said I also agree that this is trunk only material.
Great we all agree on that. Wes, would you mind committing the patch with the library boolean to trunk? +Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
