Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On fre, 2007-12-21 at 11:56 +1100, Ben Nizette wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I cannot correctly attached agentx subagents to my snmpd. If attempting >> to use unix sockets, the attach just fails with "No Checked Transport >> Domain" but that's fine, they attach just OK over udp. > > Eh, I suppose you are running on windows, right. Windows doesn't AFAIK > support AF_LOCAL sockets so that is expected in that case.
Actually no, the board is Linux unit based on the AVR32 architecture. I did check through the kernel configuration, scouting for anything vaguely unix-socketish and it's all enabled. There may well be something I'm missing though. > > Now, using UDP do sound a little odd. Me, I would have tried with TCP > since AgentX do expect a session channel. Does it work any better if you > try to run AgentX over TCP instead of UDP? In fact I had tried using TCP and it used to fail with the "no support for any checked transport domain" cruft. I just got the guy who compiled net-snmp for me to email across the configure line he used and for reasons best know to himself, he had added TCP to the --with-out-transports clause. This has been recitifed, he's been slapped and the communication now seems to be working just about fine :-) What ever the problem with sockets is, it's a different one, that transport was built in. But not to worry. I donno, if you want something done right, do it yourself eh? ;-) Thanks for your help --Ben. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
