On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:42:25 +0000 Dave wrote: DS> Hmmm... that raises an interesting question. DS> DS> Should "snmpgetnext" be applying the range checks at all? DS> DS> They make sense for the exact requests (GET and SET), because DS> if the OID isn't a valid instance according to the MIB definitions, DS> then the agent can't possibly process the request successfully. DS> DS> But that's not true for GETNEXT and GETBULK. DS> Even if the OID doesn't (and can't possibly) match a valid instance, DS> the agent should still return the next varbind that *is* valid. DS> DS> I'm inclined to amend the snmpget/snmpbulk commands to turn off the DS> range validation checks by default. DS> DS> What do other people think?
Makes sense to me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
