Hello, It's my job to maintain net-snmp in Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora distributions. During this work I fix problems reported by users and I always try to send my bug fixes and extensions to Net-SNMP patch tracker. But I am quite disappointed that most of these patches were not accepted and they did not stimulate any discussion at all.
In addition, together with IBM (namely c_varun, who did most of the job) we tried to extend IP-MIB support with latest kernel features. I think lot of users could benefit from such enhancements. Again, some of the patches were not accepted and there was no reply and I am curious why. Am I doing something wrong? Is my English not understandable? Is the description not sufficient? Are the patches wrong at all? Don't they apply clearly to SVN HEAD? It's hard to me to guess what's wrong if I get no feedback. I understand I cannot demand that you incorporate all my patches and you have limited resources, I'd just welcome a short sentence what's wrong or, preferably :), commit it to SVN if you find them OK. You can look at patches submitted by me (jsafranek) and c_varun to see the ones I am writing about. With kind regards, hoping that my patches get accepted, Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
