On Jan 20, 2008 12:42 PM, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My gut feeling would be to extend the existing engineIDType/engineID
> functionality to cover that, i.e. to introduce a new engine ID type 4
> (raw).
>
> Whatever way you prefer, please submit your final patch to
> http://www.net-snmp.org/patches so it won't get lost!
Thomas,
Thanks for responding. I thought about doing what you suggest, but I felt
that a new command like exactEngineID was a cleaner way to implement this
feature. My main reason for feelng that way is that the existing
engineIDType values all determine how an engineID is to be automatically
generated and don't require information from another command (eg. engineID).
However, I don't have strong feelings one way or the other, as long as the
functionality exists. If anyone feels strongly about it, please let me
know. Otherwise I'll just submit my current patch to the patch submission
system.
Nathan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
