Lisa Morgan/US/InfoPrint/IDE wrote on 02/08/2008 09:29:42 AM: >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/07/2008 02:17:52 AM: > > > On 06/02/2008, Lisa Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > netsnmp_register_instance( test ); > > > > OK - so you are registering individual instances > > (rather than scalar objects or whole tables). > > That helper will take care of the GETNEXT-specific > > processing, so your handler will only be called with > > GET requests. > > > > What happens if you report the missing value > > using SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHINSTANCE > > rather than SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHNAME ? > SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE has the same behavior. I'll have version 5.4.1.33 to try > very soon. I finally was able to try this on version 5.4.1-51 and it worked fine. It worked correctly for both SNMP_ERR_NOSUCHINSTANCE and SNMP_NOSUCHINSTANCE. Looks like it's time for us to upgrade. Thanks for your help. > > > > > Dave > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
