On 16/04/2008, Alejandro Islas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm kind of new to linux programming so could you please recommend > me a debugger
See http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php?title=Debugger > I used the mib2c.iterate.conf mib2c file to generate the code. > Is this the best configuration file to used as a first approach > to coding mibs tables? That should be fine, yes. I tend to prefer the mib2c.container.conf template myself, but there's a large amount of overlap between the two. > Should I used mfd file? Not if you want me to help you! :-) > My main goal is to keep my code as simple as possible The aim of the MfD framework is to hide as much of the processing as possible. It uses a separate routine for returning the value of each MIB object (for GET/GETNEXT requests), and another routine(s?) for SET processing. Personally, I'm not convinced that the code framework is any easier to work with than the iterator/container templates. But this is almost certainly due in part to lack of familiarity with this structure. Robert swears by it (while I swear at it!) I wouldn't want my prejudices to put you off investigating this framework if you think it might be easier for you. But you might need to start asking for assistance on the IRC channel. I'm not sure how much Robert reads the coders list (he certainly doesn't tend to read the users list), and it's not a framework that I'm prepared to support. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
