>>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:09:40 +0200, Jan Safranek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
JS> Question is, whether we want such Fedora-only dependencies in the .spec. JS> And another question is what about other distros - quick look at JS> Mandriva shows, that they have completely different packaging of Net-SNMP. That's always been a problem. A bigger problem is that just about every distribution has changed their packaging in some way over time. At one point, eg, we were a close copy of the fedora packaging (back before you were maintaining it) and slowly over time it diverged. I see a few choices that are acceptable: 1) provide our own list of packages and add conflicts lines 2) provide multiple spec files that better track the remote systems (possibly autobuilt from a single base template but split differently to match the different systems). JS> Second issue is that most distributions provide sample configuration JS> file in /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf. Why don't we distribute one? We got tired of people just trying to use the base config and complaining that it didn't work. Maybe something that says: # please run "snmpconf -g basic_setup" heh. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
