2008/6/2 Pachiappan D <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> View directive comes under SNMPV3.
No.
The view-based access control model was introduced
as part of the SNMPv3 framework, but can be (and is)
applied to all versions of the protocol.
> With alone SNMPv1/v2c , rocommunity directive is the only
> choice to restrict access for a subtree as below,
No - it is not.
That is the simplest approach, but it is also possible to use
more complex views - either using "rocommunity ... -v {view}"
or the full com2sec/group/view/access approach.
> In SNMPv1/v2c , I want to achieve like
> rocommunity cname default <subtree1> <subtree2>..
And I have told you how to do that.
> ( without using view directive )
Then you're stuffed. The *only* way you can
do what you are asking for is to use views.
> Is the above possible ?
Yes.
> If yes , please pave me a way to do this.
I have already given you a way to do this.
If you're not prepared to follow my advice,
then that is not my problem.
Have you actually *tried* what I suggested?
If not, why not?
Dave
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
