I, with no thought on release state, committed r16937 to all branches 05-28 without any +3.
The change is a bug fix, but it is questionable if it is release critical. If a scalar_helper(name, 1, 10) is called with GETNEXT(name.0) then it will respond with REPLY(name.0.0, value) instead of the correct REPLY(name.1.0, value). The patch adds a check for the lower bound of the range in addition to the old check for the upper bound. Should it stay applied? +1 /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
