In snmplib/mib.c:build_oid_segment the handling of ASN_IPADDRESS seems
to presume that the value is stored in var->val.integer in host byte
order but that seems very odd since the we treat IPADDRESS values as an
OCTET STRING(4) in network byte order everywhere else.

What is the motivation for doing things differently here?

How much will break if we change it?

/MF


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to