On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
Jan Houtsma wrote:Hi, Other reports are already getting in. It's only related to x86_64 systems. Apparently new releasesare only tested on i386? Because this segfault is so obvious on x86_64and happens as soon as you start the daemon with default config.As Fedora maintainer of net-snmp packages I apologize for the inconvenience. Net-SNMP was broken in Rawhide and Fedora 10 Alpha/Beta since June and nobody (including myself) did not notice it - it seems nobody tests on x86_64.I had to wait for fixed rpm to land in our build environment, which took some time. Fixed net-snmp packages are now on their way. If you want tospeed things up please leave feedback at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/net-snmp-5.4.2.1-2.fc10
I suggest that you backport the /var/cache/hrmib code so that stat(2) and opendir(3) can be used to populate the HR-MIB. The net-snmp patch is almost trivial (becuase it reuses code done on other platforms), and the patch to rpm to support populating /var/cache/hrmib within rpm, not net-snmp, sources is way easier to maintain.
The patch is used in PLD, Gentoo, and @rpm5.org, and was sent to net- snmp in August.
Truly, linking against -lrpm and dragging in Berkeley DB to daemon code has almost nothing to
do with net-snmp -- the HR-MIB can be populated much more simply. 73 de Jeff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
