Frans Grotepass wrote: > Frans Grotepass wrote: >> The problem is that for the sparc, >> + mem = netsnmp_memory_get_byIdx( NETSNMP_MEM_TYPE_PHYSMEM, 0 ); >> gives correct values, but for the amd/intel machines it gives 0 values >> > > Edit: The intel returns correct values once an snmpwalk of hrMemorySize was > done... I'll have to > check what needs to be tickled to get that bit initialised...
Edit: adding netsnmp_memory_load() fixes things... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. > The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help > pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
