I certainly will, I guess I was interested in people's opinion about whether it was valid or not - I'm not really sure if the textual conventions cover converting nodes in an OID to human readable format or if that is all kind of ad-hoc - hence the correct solution might be to change the length checking to 4 and 5 instead of 4 and 8 and encode the zone as one node and remove the ntohl - that seems just as reasonable if not more so than what I did, actually. Thoughts?
-b On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:10:24 -0800, "brian retford" <[email protected]> >>>>>> said: > > br> I seem to have ruined my diff due to copy and paste stupidity, and by > br> diff'ing across 2 versions and only giving you a partial diff. Here's a > diff > br> against 5.4.2.1: > > Can you submit the patch to our patch tracking database so we don't > loose it? > > http://www.net-snmp.org/patches/ > -- > Wes Hardaker > Sparta, Inc. > -- "The true value of a human being is determined primarily by the measure and the sense in which he has attained liberation from the self" -- Albert Einstein ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
