Hi, Dave Thank you for your recommendation. I used to use mib2c.iterate.conf, but I found the efficiency of this framework is too slow. For example i implement a table with about 4000 instances, it took me several minutes to walk this table. So, how about the efficiency of mib2c.table_data.conf?
-----邮件原件----- 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Dave Shield 发送时间: 2009年4月2日 15:46 收件人: Kang Chen 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: code size generating by mib2c.mfd.conf 2009/4/2 Kang Chen <[email protected]>: > I use mib2c.mfd.conf to generate the code, > but I find the code size is too large. > > What’s your opinion about this problem and do you have > any ways to reduce the code size? The aim of the MfD framework is to handle as much as possible of the table processing automatically. And the bits that do require developer input are deliberately broken down into lots of little functions, which are (hopefully) easier to understand. Personally, I strongly dislike this code framework, and try to avoid having anything to do with it. I'll certainly leave any support questions to those who understand it better, and appreciate its benefits. But I would fully accept that this is an irrational prejudice on my part - and it's unfair to discard this particular framework purely on my sayso. But if you're not happy with the style (and amount) of code that it generates, then it would make sense to look at one of the other table helpers that we provide. I personally tend to use the 'mib2c.table_data.conf' template (which uses the tdata helper). Give that a whirl, and see if it's any better for your purposes. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
