>>>>> On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:49:45 -0000, "Bill Fenner (gmail)" >>>>> <fen...@gmail.com> said:
Hi Bill! BF> ----------------------------------------------------------- BF> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: BF> http://review.fenron.com/r/4/ BF> ----------------------------------------------------------- Nah; I'll just reply to you... If you wish to submit patches against our package, we'd prefer you use our established tracking system rather than a different one. As much as I hate the SF tracking system, I'd hate having to use one per user even more :-) BF> The fix seems pretty straightforward: move the real_init_master() (and BF> maybe the real_init_smux()) call to after the "do" loop that calls BF> netsnmp_transport_open_server() for all of the configured transports. This BF> way a failure to initialize a transport will not result in initializing BF> agentx at all. Looks good; Thanks! I'm applying it to all branches for 5.2 and beyond. -- Wes Hardaker ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
