Jan Safranek wrote: > I don't think that suggested NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS is good idea - > the application would see the old identifiers by default. IMHO it is better > to advertise the new ones and show the old only if application (or > its packager) explicitly ask so.
At the very least, NETSNMP_NO_LEGACY_DEFINITIONS is used at quite a few places already for exactly the same purpose as discussed here. I don't think it's the best time to introduce something that's inconsistent with the current approach that late in the release cycle. Are you willing to propose a revised version of the patch to get my vote? :-) +Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
