On 29 January 2010 15:40, Bill Fenner <fen...@gmail.com> wrote: > My question is: is it sufficient to change all of the callers in the > net-snmp source tree, or should I call the function with the new > signature snmp_parse_args2() and create a helper snmp_parse_args() > that supplies a zero?
We cannot assume that there are no third-party applications which make use of the existing API calls. So a new function is definitely the way to go. Can I suggest "netsnmp_parse_args()" rather than "snmp_parse_args2()" I'd also suggest a more general "flags" parameter, rather than one specifically for logging. (Just in case we need to extend the behaviour of this routine in the future) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
