Thanks all for the inputs.
Thanks, Prasanna ________________________________________ From: Robert Story [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 11:26 AM To: Prasanna Varadharajan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Clarification required on createAndGo & createAndWait approach implementation On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:52:10 +0530 Prasanna wrote: PV> Because if the user sets the table objects first and then set the rowStatus with 4 or 5 means then there is no difference between createAndWait and createAndGo approach. Please provide your comments on this. There is a big difference. A successful set with createAndGo will result in an active row. If you use createAndWait, the row will be notInService or notReady and will require another set operation to activate it. Take a look at the RowStatus TC definition in SNMPv2-TC mib, it is pretty descriptive. ============================================================================================================================Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at <a href="http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html";>http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> externally and <a href="http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html";>http://tim.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html</a> internally within Tech Mahindra.============================================================================================================================ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
