On 03/05/2010 08:34 PM, Leonardo Chiquitto wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Robert Story<rst...@freesnmp.com>  wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:29:56 -0200 Leonardo wrote:
>> LC>  Dave, I'm interested in using a part of your work on the new filesystem
>> LC>  MIB to fix the problem described in this bug. To avoid reinventing the
>> LC>  wheel, do you think you can send me the definition of struct
>> LC>  netsnmp_fsys_info?
>>
>> Just wondering if any progress was made here?  Were you able to get the
>> missing struct definition from Dave?
>
> Unfortunately not. I spent some time reading that part of the code and trying
> to fix the problem, but so far I failed. I'd be really thankful if someone 
> could
> take a look at it.

There is a patch in Red Hat Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532672. It keeps track of 
already used indexes and tries to read /etc/mtab in the same order, 
which can lead to the file being re-read for each index.
I've tested it, it works, but I don't like rewinding /etc/mtab back and 
forth... what do you think, can it lead into performance problems?

Jan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to