On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 09:14 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche > <[email protected]> said: > > BVA> It would make several Net-SNMP maintainers happy if > support for > BVA> MSVC 6 could be dropped. > > It'd make other Net-SNMP maintainers happy if support for MSCV > could be > dropped. > > The Net-SNMP project currently contains a triple build infrastructure: > * For Unix systems, Cygwin and Mingw the autoconf and configure > infrastructure is used. > * MSVC users on Windows have the choice between an interactive build > via the .dsp files or a batch build via win32/build.bat. > > At this time there is no other choice for generating the Windows > binaries than via MSVC. Introducing a dependency on the Cygwin DLL is > not acceptable, and building Net-SNMP via Mingw results in a less > functional binary than the one generated via MSVC.
Actually, how painful would it be to build using MSVC on the command line and using cygwin or some such to get the posix environment that configure expects? /MF (good at insane ideas) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
