On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:46:40 -0800 Wes wrote:
WH> >>>>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:37:25 -0500, Robert Story <rst...@freesnmp.com> 
said:
WH> 
WH> [re: IP address lookups of com2sec returning both v4 and v6 addrs]
WH> MF> If not I  would like to know what action to take:
WH> MF> 
WH> MF> 1) Keep it as is
WH> MF> 2) Make both add all addresses
WH> MF> 3) Make both add only the first returned address
WH> 
WH> RS> Hmmm... I'd vote for 2. If we did 3, then we should log a warning that 
only
WH> RS> the first address was used.
WH> 
WH> That does seem a behavior change though.

I think you misunderstood my proposal... by 'all', I meant 'all of the
specified type'... i.e. the change for option 2 would be that com2sec would add
all returned ipv4 addresses, bringing it in line with com2sec6. option 3 would
make com2sec6 only use the first returned ipv6 address, bringing it in line
with current com2sec ipv4 behavior.

and obviously is someone wanted only one address of either, they should be
using the ipaddress instead of a dns name with multiple address records.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to