On 23 March 2010 13:15, Fatima Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...... My understanding of the mask is "1 means that the oid
> tree is in view and "0" means not in view. Another colleague told me
> that "1" means that we need an exact match and "0" means the view does
> not care about the "oid" tree.
See RFC 3415, section 2.4.2
For each possible managed object instance, that instance belongs to a
particular ViewTreeFamily if ....
- each sub-identifier in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER name of the managed
object instance matches the corresponding sub-identifier of the
family name whenever the corresponding bit of the associated
family mask is non-zero.
That seems to match your colleague's understanding.
> That is why we started the test and the
> results are not conclusive.
In what way are the results not conclusive?
Please post a particular example where you would expect a given
OID to be in (or out) of view, when the results imply otherwise.
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
