To receive inform the snmptrapd.conf need not to have -e engineID . Please check http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/TUT:Configuring_snmptrapd_to_receive_SNMPv3_notifications#Configuring_a_SNMPv3_INFORM_User
If you remove -e from snmptrap command then also snmptrapd will receive infrom because it will do an engineID probe and send the infrom with correct engineID. Correct me if i am wrong. Dave Shield wrote: > On 9 April 2010 11:53, Fatima Peter <fatima.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> snmptrap is sending inform message but is not getting inform response >> back. I enabled debug with -d and here is the exchange. If I entered >> just ".1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4.", I got an usage error: The t->local etc >> are output from snmptrap. It is sending INFORM(A6) but getting >> REPORT(A8) back: >> > > That seems to be an "usmStatsUnknownEngineID" report. > > What happens if you omit the '-e' flag from both the snmptrap > command, and the snmptrapd.conf file? > > Dave > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Net-snmp-coders mailing list > Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
