On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 20:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Jan Safranek <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         I've noticed that my recent autoconf voodoo with lm_sensors
>         detection does not work in 5.5 branch, because
>         configure.d/config_os_headers is checked *after*
>         configure.d/config_modules_lib.
>         
>         In the trunk you moved configure.d/config_os_headers before
>         configure.d/config_modules_lib in SVN rev. 18030. Would you
>         mind if I do the same change in V5-5-patches? Or are there
>         some consequences I do not see?
> 
> Good question. Personally I have no objections, but please keep in
> mind that I'm not an expert with regard to which checks should be run
> in which order. Any feedback from other maintainers is welcome.

I generally think that config_modules_lib and config_modules_agent
should be run last but sadly some tests are conditional on the outcome
of them. (or at least some were last I checked - I think those tests
should be made unconditional by the way)

/MF


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to