>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 12:23:49 +0430, majid namnabat <maj....@gmail.com> >>>>> said:
mn> I think there were conflict between serial signal SIGIO, and mn> agent_check_and_process(0) function. Also I have an important 300 ms mn> timer. Is there there was a conflict between this timer (SIGALRM) and mn> agent_check_and_process(0) function? If you're handling other signals then you should probably take a look at the way our agent deals with signals. We deliberately record the fact that a signal has happened but don't act on it until agent_check_and_process and other processing happens. IE, we delay actually dealing with the signal till it's safe to do so. It'll be a bit harder to do with other signals, though. -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
