During yesterday's admin meeting, I mentioned some work I'd been doing to review and revise the questions that are used in the basic "mib2c" template, and provide guidance towards a suitable table framework to use for implementing any given table.
Attached is a copy of the proposed new template. I'd be interested in hearing what people think. Are these questions any use? How could they be improved? Is it worth including this in the upcoming 5.6 release? Or are we better off sticking with the current template questions? [Note that this template also checks for a mixed scalar/table invocation, which would typically end up overrwriting the scalar code file with the table one. But that's not the main thrust of this re-write] Dave
mib2c.conf
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
