On 23 August 2010 16:54, Wes Hardaker <harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > RS> updating existing ifdefs seems fine... what's with the extra ifdefs for > the > RS> variable decls? I'd expect to see a corresponding ifdef where the vars are > RS> used. > > I agree with Robert: I questioned the exact same thing.
If you check the code, the only place where the two variables actually appear in this file *is* within just such an #ifdef block. I'm not sure why - since this functionality doesn't seem to be tied in to the presence or absence of the SSL library. But the proposed patch is at least consistent with the existing code. Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
