On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:51:06 -0400 Robert wrote: RS> WH> I think I'm leaning against this one for 5.6 as it seems new-feature-ish RS> WH> and we're beyond that point. RS> RS> I dunno, I can see lack of description as a bug. So I'll vote +1 and let RS> other shoot us down if it seems like a feature... :-)
Actually, if the ifAlias patch made me remember that ifDescr is settable in the current implementation, so any mucking around with ifDescr needs to be intergrated with existing code... so -1... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
