(note to Bart: we're in "voting mode" for release candidates on the
trunk right now. Which means no one should be touching trunk without
discussion -coders first please. Thanks!)
Bart already applied this patches which means:
1) if it doesn't get +3 it will be reverted
2) we need to decide if it's worth it to publish a rc3 because of it
(and another):
However the patch gets +1 for me, though I probably wouldn't hold up 5.6
for it just to do another rc3.
--- trunk/net-snmp/include/net-snmp/library/snmpTLSBaseDomain.h 2010/09/04
06:37:23 19371
+++ trunk/net-snmp/include/net-snmp/library/snmpTLSBaseDomain.h 2010/09/04
06:38:19 19372
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
struct snmp_session *sess);
int tls_get_verify_info_index(void);
- void *netsnmp_tlsbase_free_tlsdata(_netsnmpTLSBaseData *tlsbase);
+ void netsnmp_tlsbase_free_tlsdata(_netsnmpTLSBaseData *tlsbase);
#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif
--- trunk/net-snmp/snmplib/transports/snmpTLSBaseDomain.c 2010/09/04
06:37:23 19371
+++ trunk/net-snmp/snmplib/transports/snmpTLSBaseDomain.c 2010/09/04
06:38:19 19372
@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@
return tlsdata;
}
-void *netsnmp_tlsbase_free_tlsdata(_netsnmpTLSBaseData *tlsbase) {
+void netsnmp_tlsbase_free_tlsdata(_netsnmpTLSBaseData *tlsbase) {
if (!tlsbase)
return;
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
