On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 09:58 +0000, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 19421 > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=19421&view=rev > Author: bvassche > Date: 2010-10-13 09:58:34 +0000 (Wed, 13 Oct 2010) > > Log Message: > ----------- > CHANGES: Cygwin: Running the unit tests does now work (cd testing && > ./RUNFULLTESTS -g unit-tests). > CHANGES: MinGW: Running the unit tests does now work (cd testing && > ./RUNFULLTESTS -g unit-tests).
Some of the changes here do look a tad odd. -cat > $2.c << EOF1 +rm -f "$2.c" +cat >>"$2.c" <<EOF Why is rm -f x ; foo >> x better than foo > x? -#include "$1" +EOF +cat >>"$2.c" "$1" +cat >>"$2.c" <<EOF This one is interesting - I think the reason for the #include as opposed to outright inclusion is to get the error messages reported in the correct file and not in some temporary file. Did that not work as expected? /MF ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
