BV> CHANGES: agent: Added netsnmp_get_table_iterator2().
BV> ...

So...  In general the newer handler things were created in a way that
should be possible to not require new APIs to do things.  IE, it should
be possible to create new flags, etc, using the structures and
extensibility mechanisms so we don't need new APIs.

For the above, the only difference is:

  netsnmp_handler_owns_iterator_info(me) // me is the hanndler

Now...  To be honest I haven't followed all the code yet (it's early and
I have a meeting in a few hours I need to prep for).  So, where was the
bug/issue/whatever that caused the need for a new API?
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, 
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database 
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to