On 01/31/2011 07:52 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:59:45 -0500, Doug Manley<[email protected]>  
>>>>>> said:
>
> DM>  What team/committee is responsible for the HOST-RESOURCES MIB?
>
> It came out of the IETF.  I've often thought that it needs a revmap, as
> there are a number of issues with it that have occurred because of how
> the world has changed in size (the advent of multiple-core processors
> has also affected the MIB).
>
> Regardless of where it would be pushed forward, it can't modify the
> existing meanings of the existing objects.
>
> So I think it's pseudo-legal to rewrite the block size.
> hrStorageAllocationUnits gives the appearance that it's monitoring the
> raw blocks on the device, but really the wording is more generic than
> that:
>
>          "The size, in bytes, of the data objects allocated
>          from this pool.  If this entry is monitoring sectors,
>          blocks, buffers, or packets, for example, this number
>          will commonly be greater than one.  Otherwise this
>          number will typically be one."
>
> IE, it would be easy to claim that our "entry" is monitoring an
> aggregated set of blocks rather than an individual block then I think
> you could even say you were compliant.
>
> The real question, though, is: is there anyone using that value out in
> the wild as the *real* block size and depending on it?  I'd bet not, but
> of course it'll still be just that: "a bet".

I can easily add new config token 'recalculateStorageUnits yes/no', 
probably off by default (=same behaviour as it is now), and let admin 
choose what he wants. Does it look better to you?

Jan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to