>>>>> On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:58:37 +0100, Magnus Fromreide >>>>> <[email protected]> said:
MF> I have been thinking of an netsnmp_returns_1() that could be used for MF> situations like this one, but that is just plain ugly. It's an ugly problem. And I'm sorry to have been the one that created it :-) - We can't depend on inline. - We can't necessarily depend on the macro being used in a way that is safe to replace with a single '1'. - Thus, having a empty function almost makes sense. But that's also defeating the purpose :-/ Possible solutions: 1) define the return_1 function, put it into a feature itself and have the turn-of-stats feature require it. That means it'll only be included if needed. 2) optionally create an additional use_inline or safe_one feature (yes, those are bad names) that will revert to the 'inline' or '1' definitions if the user selects them because they know it's safe. That way we can leave it up to the user, and it'll be a good test of the feature system :-/ -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
